Skip to content

History or hatred? Selling Hitler’s belongings and Nazi artifacts stirs a backlash

Author
PUBLISHED: | UPDATED:

He has auctioned the journals of Nazi death camp doctor Josef Mengele for $300,000, Adolf Hitler’s telephone from the Führerbunker for $243,000 and Hitler’s ring featuring a swastika made of 16 rubies for more than $65,000. And just before Thanksgiving, a Hitler-inscribed propaganda photograph that shows the architect of the Holocaust hugging a German girl of Jewish heritage went for more than $11,000.

Big money abounds in the Nazi artifact market, and Basil “Bill” Panagopulos, founder of Alexander Historical Auctions in Maryland, is the trade’s unabashed promoter. But at a time of growing anti-Semitism and white nationalism, the buying and selling of Hitler’s belongings and other Third Reich tchotchkes – including counterfeits – is stirring up the same kind of debate that has dogged displays of Confederate flags and Civil War statues.

Which items of the past are worth keeping? Which spoils of war should be preserved? And which symbols of hatred are better off consigned to history’s trash heap?

Online giants like Facebook and eBay, along with Christie’s and Sotheby’s, have come down hard against the sale of Nazi artifacts, curbing or banning their sale. Right after the sale of the Hitler photo in Maryland, another sale this month in Australia of some 75 Nazi artifacts kicked up a national controversy and prompted a rebuke from the local Anti-Defamation Commission.

Still, the demand for these objects is intensifying, according to Terry Kovel, co-founder of a 51-year-old annual price guide for antiques and memorabilia.

“The market for historic Nazi memorabilia is definitely growing,” she said. “A lot of people are afraid the whole Nazi thing has been forgotten, and they want to show what was going on. More of it is coming out of hiding, too, because so much of the material came home with soldiers who are getting to the age of dying, and their families are selling it off.”

Many Jewish groups, though not all, have denounced these sales.

Haim Gertner, the archives director of Yad Vashem, Israel’s leading Holocaust memorial, said some of Hitler’s personal items are worth saving, especially if the owners of Nazi artifacts believe that the material and anti-Semitic history should never be forgotten. But selling these artifacts to the highest bidder, he said, “is incorrect and even immoral.”

Rabbi Marvin Hier, founder of the Simon Wiesenthal Center in Los Angeles, said some Hitler or Nazi party documents or objects should be preserved, particularly their writings revealing their murderous aims. But he said other Nazi memorabilia – much of which were smuggled out of Germany by American service members – merely inflate the dictator’s mystique and embolden anti-Semites.

“The Hitler salute is coming back in this country, and bigots get their nourishment from seeing things like this photo and the girl,” Hier said. “People will see that photo and say, ‘Maybe Hitler had a good side to him’ and ‘Don’t judge him so badly.’ “

But Panagopulos, 60, whose auction house is based about 100 miles northeast of Washington, D.C., said the market is being driven by World War II movies, documentaries and endless segments on the History Channel, once derided as “The Hitler Channel.” Many buyers of the expensive, headline-generating Nazi memorabilia are Jewish.

One of them is Michael Bulmash, 74, a retired Jewish clinical psychologist from Delaware. He has spent the last two decades buying Holocaust material, a sizable portion from Alexander Historical Auctions. He has donated everything – including children’s books published by the anti-Semitic publisher Julius Streicher and an old back issue of Streicher’s newspaper, Der Stürmer – to his alma mater, Kenyon College in Ohio, for the Bulmash Family Holocaust Collection.

“It’s all about getting this stuff out in people’s faces,” Bulmash said, “especially when you had neo-Nazis marching in Charlottesville and the president of the United States creating a false equivalence between what neo-Nazis were doing and what the people who were trying to stop them were doing.”

Another Panagopulos client, Howard Cohen, 68, a retired Jewish optometrist in Pittsburgh, keeps all kinds of “anti-Semitica” from Nazi Germany in his home, including a Der Stürmer ashtray featuring a caricature of a hooknosed Jew he got for about $2,000. He hides the material in drawers or boxes, so no houseguest would ever see them. His wife and adult children do not necessarily approve or understand, he said.

All his clients are serious history buffs, Panagopulos said, not skinheads or white nationalists.

“Skinheads don’t have the means for it, and, even if they did have the means, they would have no historical appreciation for it,” Panagopulos said. “I’m not some knucklehead, blood-drooling neo-Nazi. My wife is Jewish. Her mother is an orthodox Jew. Her father is a Jew. And my father’s hometown in Greece was wiped out by Germans in World War II.”

But the image of Hitler still resonates with extremists. James A. Fields Jr. – a self-professed neo-Nazi convicted of first-degree murder on Dec. 7 for driving his car into a crowd of counterprotesters in Charlottesville, killing one woman and wounding 35 others – texted his mother a meme of Hitler when she urged him to be careful at the “Unite the Right” rally. “We’re not the one who need [sic] to be careful,” Fields told her.

Panagopulos established his auction house in Stamford, Connecticut, in 1991, first specializing in far less incendiary fare: a lock of President Abraham Lincoln’s hair, or presidential autographs. Then, about eight years ago, he got into Third Reich memorabilia.

His first attention-getters were two sets of Mengele journals. In 2010, he sold one notebook for close to $50,000 to an orthodox Jew whose grandmother survived Auschwitz. But the American Gathering of Jewish Holocaust Survivors and Their Descendants organization found the sale disgusting and asked Richard Blumenthal, then Connecticut’s attorney general, to investigate its authenticity.

“I sympathize with their revulsion regarding the apparent profit from this journal,” Blumenthal said in a statement at the time.

Spokespersons for Blumenthal and the Holocaust survivors group said they do not recall whether a probe was ever launched. Panagopulos said Blumenthal, now a Democratic senator from Connecticut, never contacted him.

A year later, he sold the remainder of Mengele’s journals, for $300,000. The buyer was also a Jew, Panagopulos said. But the sale still generated a backlash.

“If you really want to despise someone, look no further than Stamford, Conn., where you can find Basil (Bill) Panagopulos who runs Alexander Historical Auctions,” began an op-ed in the New York Daily News by an American Gathering executive.

Undeterred, Panagopulos continued selling all manner of paraphernalia: a cache of medical documents showing the führer suffered from flatulence and was injected with an extract of bull testicles to jump-start his libido; an archive of letters, poetry and school papers of Nazi propaganda chief Joseph Goebbels; and a U.S. Army interrogator’s notes of his interview with Hitler’s doctors that revealed Hitler took female hormones.

In 2014, after Panagopulos moved the auction house to Chesapeake City, Maryland, he sold perhaps his grisliest item: a bloodstained scrap of fabric from the sofa where Hitler shot himself on April 30, 1945. The winning bid: $18,000. He kept another piece for himself but does not display it.

“Strange, isn’t it? Why would someone keep this?” he asked, clutching the cloth. “But what a rarity!”

Although Panagopulos is a proud spokesman for his trade, many others who deal in Nazi material are far more secretive.

Case in point: both the consignor and the buyer of the photo showing Hitler hugging Rosa Bernile Nienau, a girl of Jewish descent. Hitler’s close friend Heinrich Hoffman photographed Hitler with many children and made multiple prints of the same photos, which were widely distributed across Germany. But Hitler liked Nienau so much – they shared the same birthday, April 20 – that she earned the moniker “the Führer’s child” and she called him “Uncle Hitler.”

As is custom in the auction world, Panagopulos declined to reveal the identities of his clients. At The Washington Post’s request, Panagopulos asked the top bidder of the photo, who lives in Britain, for an interview, but the winner never responded to his request. The photo’s consignor declined via Panagopulos to comment.

When The Post reached Don Boyle of Scranton, Pennsylvania, a well-known collector of World War II German artifacts, he said he had once owned the photo and traded it in 2007 to Arizona collector Jeff Clark, who runs a website that sells Nazi party uniforms.

It was Clark who consigned the photo to Panagopulos, Boyle said.

In an email, Clark denied knowing about the photograph, let alone selling it. “I had to [G]oogle to find out what you were talking about,” he wrote.

The sale of the photo was covered by news outlets worldwide. One Amsterdam-based journalist questioned the authenticity of Hitler’s inscription: “The dear and [considerate?] Rosa Nienau Adolf Hitler Munich, the 16th June 1933.”

“[C]ounterfeit Nazi junk,” declared Bart FM Droog, who is working on a book about fake Hitler artifacts.

Elaine Quigley, who chairs the British Institute of Graphologists, said the photo’s inscription matches with some of Hitler’s earlier known handwriting, especially his autograph.

Panagopulos said the photo was consigned with multiple supporting documents and the original envelope, featuring the blind-embossed (inkless) stamp of Hoffman’s studio, in which it was delivered to the Nienau family.

Shortly after the auction, Panagopulos said, he got word from the Dokumentation Obersalzberg in Germany, a government-funded museum chronicling the area’s ties to the Nazi party, that it wants to put a copy of the photograph in a permanent exhibit.

“I’ve seen hundreds of Hitler autographs. I am confident in the signature,” Panagopulos said. “And if I’m wrong? I’m on the hook in perpetuity. We offer a one hundred percent warranty of authenticity.”

This story originally appeared in The Washington Post.