RICHMOND — While most people go to church to worship, security expert Chernoh Wurie goes to worship and protect. He leads security at Hill City Church in the Richmond area.
A bill to allow weapons, including firearms, within places of worship died in the House last week. Senate Bill 1024, introduced by Sen. Richard Black, R-Loudoun, passed the Senate along party lines, 21-19, but died in the House Rules Committee. The bill sought to repeal a law on the books since the 1950s.
“It’s chaos waiting to happen if you ask me,” Wurie said. “It gets a lot more problematic when you put guns in churches.”
Hill City Church, a non-denominational Christian church off Staples Mill Road near the Richmond city line, has a strict no-firearms policy, with signs up throughout the building. The only people allowed to carry a weapon are Wurie and his security team, picked he said because of their police training.
Wurie said places of worship without an organized security team might be more likely to allow congregation members to carry because “there is no other form of protection.”
Gun violence has occurred at places of worship in the recent past.
» In October, 11 were killed and seven injured in a mass shooting at the Tree of Life synagogue in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
» In November 2017, 26 people were killed and about 20 injured in a mass shooting at the First Baptist Church in Sutherland Springs, Texas.
» In January 2017, a mass shooting at the Islamic Cultural Centre of Quebec City left six dead and 17 injured.
Some said the number of casualties in Texas would have been higher if a civilian hadn’t fired at the shooter. But other groups feel uncomfortable with firearms in a place of worship.
The Virginia Interfaith Center for Public Policy is a coalition of more than 700 faith groups. The organization opposed SB 1024 and urged members to contact legislators, saying that worship spaces should “be holy, safe and a refuge” and “free of violence.”
Wurie said he thinks some places would allow members of their congregation to carry firearms, and it is ultimately the institution’s decision.
He said if the bill had passed, he would have anticipated institutions potentially hiring congregation members with security experience.
“It can be a distraction, to a point, for both security and the congregation,” Wurie said. “If everyone is allowed to carry arms during worship, it could be a distraction for the people.”
If the bill had passed the House, Imad Damaj, faculty adviser for the Muslim Student Association at Virginia Commonwealth University, said the group planned to lobby the governor to veto it and that the organization did not think the bill would make anyone safer.
“We spoke against it; a lot of people in the Muslim community spoke against it,” Damaj said. “Accidents can happen. You come to a place of worship for peace, prayer and inspiration.”
Damaj worships at the Islamic Center of Virginia. He also said weapons would be a distraction to the congregation.
“People don’t feel comfortable praying next to people who carry arms,” he said.
He questioned whether Black spoke with faith leaders before introducing the bill.
“I can tell you from the Muslim community perspective … we don’t want that [the bill],” Damaj said. Just before the Senate approved the bill on Jan. 24, Black said that congregation members are “vulnerable” and “the ultimate target” of someone who intends to inflict “mayhem on the congregation.” He pointed to church shootings in recent years, including a 2015 mass shooting in Charleston, South Carolina by a white supremacist who killed nine black churchgoers during a Bible study service.
“You cower in place or you fight back,” Black said.
Black did not respond to requests for a comment on the legislation.